Navigating Governance at Different Scales – Lessons from Virginia & the BVI

I am coming up for air after an intense two months of diving head first into the legislative policy world that is the Virginia House of Delegates.

Coming from a small island (the Virgin Islands (UK)), where policymaking can sometimes feel unpredictable and reactive rather than structured and strategic, I wanted an opportunity to learn how policymaking can be more strategic, and more effective for citizens. What better place to learn than inside the Virginia General Assembly?

Virginia boasts the oldest continuous legislative body in the Western Hemisphere. The 2025 session was its 406th session! Started in 1619 as the House of Burgesses, they know a thing or two about legislating. Virginians take pride in their state's deep political history, being home to the most U.S. presidents.

I do admit it was intimidating and heavy facing the statue of TJ as some delegates affectionately call one of America's Founding Fathers - Thomas Jefferson, as he kept a watchful eye on his Capitol. I imagine that the weight of the purpose of the Capitol Building was felt by legislators and staff, every day.

The House of Delegates operates from the Virginia General Assembly. It is a bicameral body, with the House of Delegates (the lower house, representing the majority of Virginians with 100 seats) and the Senate (regional and statewide representation with 40 seats). As I learned, the bicameral process ensures that the right checks and balances are in place as to successfully turn policy into law, it has to go through and be approved by both bodies. They collectively serve over 8.8 million constituents.

In the Virgin Islands, the House of Assembly with its 15 members, including an unelected Speaker and Attorney General, represents under 30,000 residents. The legislative body of the territory has undergone significant evolution since its inception in 1950, then, the Legislative Council. It was a return to self-governance after decades of direct colonial administration under the Leeward Islands Federation.

But it was only until 1967 when the BVI adopted a new constitution granting greater internal self-governance that the Legislative Council comprised of elected officials, from the local population.

Because of its current colonial status, or we should be politically correct and say its Overseas Territory status to the UK, the BVI's House of  Assembly, operates within the British parliamentary democracy framework, with the United Kingdom retaining oversight on matters such as defence and the public service.

In recent years, the UK has exercised its authority with the consistent threat of the suspension of the constitution of the Virgin Islands, and its democratically elected House of Assembly.

One of the things that absolutely fascinates me about Virginia's General Assembly is that it is a part-time body. Legislators meet for two months to pass laws and a budget, it's signed by the Governor (or not), and then the public service does its thing. Of course, committees meet when necessary throughout the year, but the legislative work largely ends at the close of session in February during the odd years and in early March during even years.

Everything is online, bills can be tracked by a constituent, and constituents are aggressively asked to participate at all levels - even testifying at committee meetings (Caribbean citizens are in shock and awe reading this). Within the internal workings of public officers in the General Assembly, the use of technology has made what could be a paper-intensive ordeal to get bills drafted, revised and to the floor, - it's all a seemingly simple, clickable and traceable task.

Virginians don't play about getting a bill passed to do just about anything. Principal of the Division of Legislative Services, Amigo Wade explained the process so simply, that it opened a whole new way of thinking about the technicalities of getting an idea into law.  For this session, his team drafted 1,194 bills, with 917 passing both chambers in 46 days.

I'm used to a full-time assembly with a seemingly loose schedule, slightly complicated means of getting your hands on bills before they are brought to the floor and in recent years, legislating happening in obscurity.  And at the end of the legislative process - when it's time for another election, we are neither more informed nor purposefully aligned with a direction that can strategically build a small nation. More on that another day.

What I've learned and come to appreciate in the Spartan Race that's the General Assembly is, though it is built and fiercely guards its historical traditions, it has evolved to be a technically savvy and strategic body. There wasn't a minute spent in those 46 days that wasn't purposeful.

‍

‍

I had the awesome learning opportunity to support Delegate Candi Mundon King. Though there were days she drove from her district into Richmond, she was usually at her office by 630 each morning, ran her committees, was a force on the floor, attended various caucuses, met with advocacy groups, heads of major corporations, lobbyists and all that comes with being in session for 46 days!

Despite my professional background, Virginia's legislative pace was transformative. Island time quickly gave way while meeting droves of constituents on any given advocacy day, reading through bills and contemplating 50 questions so I understood what was about to happen in the next meeting as well as the energy it takes to plan advocacy days for advocates convening on the Capitol from various parts of Virginia on issues and policies that are important to your delegate.

The experience was at times overwhelming, but a crash course in learning about governance at different scales. Policymaking looks very different depending on where you stand. Coming from a small island state, policy decisions are very direct. In Virginia, however, governance is layered and expansive. My immersion in these contrasting systems revealed three critical takeaways that I believe can apply to governance at any scale:

1. Effective Representation Requires Intentional Community Engagement
2. Bureaucratic Structure Must Balance with Operational Agility
3. Strategic Long-Term Planning Reduces Governance Costs

Let me elaborate:

1. Effective Representation Requires Intentional Community Engagement

In the BVI, governance feels deeply personal. Decision makers are accessible, and community concerns can often be addressed with a direct conversation with the Premier while they are "liming" on a Friday night. In Virginia, advocacy takes on a different form - it requires coordinated lobbying efforts, extensive coalition-building, and long-term persistence to push policies forward.

Much of this requires funding, which is a level of maturity that in the Virgin Islands and wider Caribbean we have not been able to do on our own. Of course, we have resident millionaires and billionaires who push their own policies, which can be important in the long run, but there's never that same financial energy to advocate for other things, like ensuring consumer protection becomes more than a talking point or that public and green spaces are both protected and accessible, and laws that provide basic dignity to the average girl or guy trying to make their way.

Regardless of size, I still believe that the best policies come from engaged communities. Whether it’s a village meeting or advocates working the rounds at their state's Capitol, representation does matter. The question for strategists and policymakers is: How do we ensure all voices, especially the underserved, are genuinely heard in decision-making? I have a few thoughts, but I'm still mulling those around before offering them for public dissecting.

2. Bureaucratic Structure Must Balance with Operational Agility

This aspect was interesting from my perspective because I anticipated more bureaucracy in Virginia. But then again, admittedly, I'm a bit of a bore. I’ll wait four years for a solid policy that moves the needle forever, because sustainable change isn’t about speed, it’s about impact.

Larger jurisdictions follow intricate legislative processes, ensuring necessary checks and balances. This does bring a great deal of structure to manage the task at hand, but it can slow down the policy-making process to address desperate needs.  For me, this also emphasizes the importance of advocacy and engagement to keep matters top of mind for legislators. There is an important role for constituent groups and yes, for the lobbyists too.

In response to urgent matters, like public health crises, natural disasters and the need to quickly change policies to immediately address such matters, the United States federal system allows Congress or Executive Orders to step in.  This brings in the weight of the federal system and the treasury. We can recall Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.

While the Virgin Islands has the United Kingdom to call on; like Virginians in the 18th century, that relationship is currently on the rocks. Like the US federal government, the UK continues to uphold its administrative responsibility and supported the BVI when it was faced with the devastation of two Category 5 Hurricanes, Irma and Maria in September 2017 and the 2020 pandemic.

As it relates to the legislative process, I will say that Virginia's use of technology has massively supported the size of the task at hand. There is also much that can be said about its legislative traditions and processes and those that keep those traditions alive and continuously refine their processes.

With over four hundred years of history, I'm certain the mistakes that younger territories like the Virgin Islands are currently making, were also made. I believe that these are the details that small states can pay attention to as there is no way to avoid growing pains. How we do this, well, that is the lesson to learn.

When it comes to legislating, the Virgin Islands, by contrast, can pivot quickly, responding to immediate needs without excessive red tape. For example, a constant threat to the economy of the Virgin Islands is the ever-changing goalposts in financial services, the territory's main economic pillar. With the publishing of the jurisdiction on a new blacklist today, policies are quickly reoriented in a few days or weeks, the House meets and passes a bill within another day, and we live to see another financial services day.  How this agility will serve us in the next 10 - 20 years, I also have some thoughts on that too - but that is also for another day.

The best governance models strike the right balance—structured but responsive.

Neither extreme works. Over-regulation stifles progress, and unchecked agility erodes accountability. The best governance models strike the right balance — structured but responsive. Unchecked agility was evident in the Virgin Islands during the 2021 Commission of Inquiry where residents were stunned by the woeful inadequacies of a public service unable to keep up with the times and managing politicians seeking to quickly make a necessary impact.

It was not our finest hour or weeks, our couple of years. We were exposed. The systems were not in place. And for a trade-off in agility, it's forever jeopardized the public's confidence in the way we govern ourselves. And for a colony, that is a crack in our confidence and foundation, that will not soon be soothed.

The best governance models balance careful deliberation with the ability to respond efficiently when needed.  But that is best achieved by embracing my final point - the need for data-driven strategic planning.

3. Strategic Long-Term Planning Reduces Governance Costs

One of the starkest differences I observed was how long-term forecasting drives policy in larger jurisdictions. Virginia leverages data and economic projections to shape legislative priorities for decades ahead.

A good example of this is the Virginia Clean Economy Act (VCEA) which seeks to leapfrog the state to be powered 100% by clean energy by 2050. VCEA requires the state's power companies to transition to clean energy, close carbon-emitting plants and reduce overall carbon emissions.

Within this big idea is the belief that Virginians do need to save on energy costs regardless of where they live, that Virginians should have protected land for future use, improved air quality, access to clean energy jobs and the development of a vibrant economy not dependent on the destruction of the environment.

The state operates on a biennial budget cycle. In even-numbered years, the General Assembly adopts a new two-year budget. In odd-numbered years, like 2025, the session is used to amend and balance the existing budget based on revenue projections and emerging needs.

So with such a big idea as VCEA, it is during each legislative session, that those concerned on any side, and with the state, come to argue their points with the data, and sometimes advance the idea or take a step back.

In this session, an important bill failed because the environmentalists didn't get all they wanted, so they opted not to support the bill, and the bill failed. This supports the continuation of energy production with coal. We wait to see how this conversation evolves in the 2026 session.

Meanwhile, smaller nations like the Virgin Islands often focus on practical and immediate solutions because of resource limitations.  The volatile nature of politics in the Caribbean dictates that we get a new strategic plan every election cycle, which continues to be an expensive undertaking.  We've traded foresight with impatience as we endlessly chase quick wins.

We've lost the confidence to consider big ideas. But I do not believe that small nations must choose between immediacy and foresight.

A strategic approach integrates long-term vision into short-term policymaking, ensuring that those policies are sustainable without sacrificing needed adjustments as we develop and as the world continues to change.

While this might seem boring, it is in fact, less expensive and ensures a quality of life for residents that fosters economic growth and social cohesion, which are intimately connected to the way we must develop in the Caribbean.

This experience has crystallized an important truth: while governance mechanisms may differ dramatically by scale, the fundamental principles of effectiveness remain constant.

The most effective governance systems, regardless of size, amplify community voices, balance structure with agility, and commit to strategic planning that outlives political cycles. These aren’t abstract ideals; they’re practical necessities that shape daily lives and drive collective prosperity.

For the Caribbean, this means we can maintain our adaptive advantages while integrating the structured planning that larger jurisdictions utilize to proven effect. We need not choose between responsive governance and sustainable vision, the most effective systems harmonize both.

As governance challenges grow increasingly complex worldwide, those who can navigate between systems of different scales bring valuable perspectives. I'm committed to applying these insights to help the global majority build governance frameworks that honor local context while implementing global best practices. If you or your organization needs strategic insights or policy communication support, let’s talk. My DMs are always open.